When checking for staffdrops i noticed that staff is totally missing.
It is the drop supposed to be for enchanters!
Its another example of poorly researched item on daoczam-database, so it seems :p
But i got other solid sources for this one. See evidence
1. Log hib
2. Farm all named in sheereo hills
3. Ever heard of "Dealrach Slatag" ?!
4. Find evidence it should exist for 1.65
Add the staff "Dealrach Slatag"
Damage Type: Crush
DPS: 16.50
Delay: 3.00
Magical Bonuses:
Intelligence: 42 pts
Focus Bonuses:
Enchantment: +50 lvls
Way of the Moon: +50 lvls
Way of the Sun: +50 lvls
Magical Ability:
Function: Stat Enhancement
Value: 75
Target: Self
Duration: 10 min
Cast Time: instant
Radius: 3
Charges: 10
http://camelotherald.wikia.com/wiki/Patch_Notes:_Version_1.64
"The named encounters (other than the dragons) in Sheeroe Hills, Dartmoor, and Malmohus now have their own exclusive item drops, instead of utilizing item drops from other parts of their respective zones."
Skin of the staff( notice same skin as the other 3x 50focus drops for ani,menta,eld!)
http://90plan.ovh.net/~bdodaoc/images/snap_item/22263.jpg
German + french source saying it should drop from "Glimmer Venlar" or "Venlar le Blafard" in french
https://www.daocs-validated-items.de/show.php?itemid=9748
http://90plan.ovh.net/~bdodaoc/index.php?mode=view_obj&id=2263&type=2&sid=a02789205aca5156d9830407d518588b
First time mentioned on daoc zam is Sep 2004
http://web.archive.org/web/20040908014858/http://camelot.allakhazam.com/item.html?citem=15831
But you'll find a topic on the daoc french forums where a guy is asking for this staff in Feb 7. 2004
http://forums.jeuxonline.info/showthread.php?t=286566
French server were part of the euro-daocserver and Patch 1.63 + 1.64 + 1.65 were patched at once at Feb 3. 2004 !
http://forums.jeuxonline.info/showthread.php?t=284805
That means 4 days after the patches 1.63-1.65 hit EUlive that guy on the french forum know about the "Dealrach Slatag" and was looking for it... :>
issue was resolved by Gnome
|
4 players say this report is valid, 0 disagree |