Pet Resists?

User avatar
Juri
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 766
Joined: Mar 10, 2011 03:18

Postby Juri » Feb 14, 2017 15:26

There are multiple sources quoted in the issue that bring to the same exact formula. They probably are all wrong, right?
Also: aren't we basing every issue on internet sources anyway, since we almost never have official ways to back it up?! What are we supposed to do, get in touch with people who programmed the game 15 years ago and ask them to release the code????

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15821
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Feb 14, 2017 17:32

Juri wrote:Also: aren't we basing every issue on internet sources anyway, since we almost never have official ways to back it up?!

No, primary source are live tests. If there was no obvious change to it, thats completely legit.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

User avatar
DaytonChambers
Warder
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Feb 14, 2017 04:45

Postby DaytonChambers » Feb 15, 2017 03:22

Abydos wrote: "With the correct formula" based on an internet source that has no data backed up and tons of data that refutes the claims? (Note: I havent looked, but this is often the case with formula claims)


The formula is:

Charm Level = (Mentalist Level X .66) + ((Light Spec + Spec Modifier) X .33)

This formula has been around for 15 years. Simply dropping that formula into google pops up dozens of responses from sites as far back as 2002, Including the Gaheris web page. I am unable to post the Gaheris web page url as a new user, but it is about 4th down the list on page one of web searches for the posted formula.

I myself have reliably used this formula for the six level 50 mentalists I have built over the years. This formula does NOT work on Uth 2.0

Simple as that.

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15821
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Feb 15, 2017 04:09

Charmlevel is not a resist rate. That doesn't help much.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

User avatar
DaytonChambers
Warder
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Feb 14, 2017 04:45

Postby DaytonChambers » Feb 15, 2017 05:39

Blue wrote:Charmlevel is not a resist rate. That doesn't help much.


Well, obviously. Charm level is the level of the target of the spell which can be successfully controlled.

As far as the rate of resist? NO CLUE. I am not a Mythic developer. All I can tell you is that the rate of resist on Uth 2.0, if you were to use the time-tested formula, is 90% or worse. Which is so far from live-like it's almost comical.
Last edited by DaytonChambers on Feb 15, 2017 05:47, edited 1 time in total.

stikynote
Warder
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Jan 18, 2017 01:03

Postby stikynote » Feb 15, 2017 16:06

The formula is for what level of mob you can reliably charm and hold. Resist rate has a direct correlation to charm level for mentalist. Reliable charm is where you have a low enough resist rate that you can hold a pet and not have a such a high resist rate that you only hold the mob a short period of time. I have light 6 points above my level and charming a mob my level the resist rate is so high I can only hold it maybe 1/2 the time, the other 1/2 I am running away from it.
I don't have live, but I am sure someone does and it would be easy to run tests. Just find the resist rates for different level mobs and composite light. Get a decent sample size ~100 charms only takes 1000 seconds.

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15821
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Feb 15, 2017 16:34

Mentalist charms have special handling in our code for resist rates and I can't tell you why and on what sources that is based on. Looks like a full retest is required.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

User avatar
pweet
Lion Knight
 
Posts: 4243
Joined: Dec 22, 2010 14:07

Postby pweet » Feb 15, 2017 17:23

That formula doesn't make sense. It is a stochastic problem.

User avatar
DaytonChambers
Warder
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Feb 14, 2017 04:45

Postby DaytonChambers » Feb 16, 2017 05:18

pweet wrote:That formula doesn't make sense. It is a stochastic problem.


Lemme break it down.

That formula again is: Charm Level = (Mentalist Level X .66) + ((Light Spec + Spec Modifier) X .33)

So, using the above formula and rounding down on all values to be conservative, and plugging in a RR1 mentalist, level 50, specced 45 in light, with +11 to light from gear:

(50 x .66 = 33) + ((45+11=56) x.33 = 18.48, or 18)

so... 33 + 18 = 51

The formula says that a level 50 RR1 Ment with 45+11 light spec should be able to reliably hold a level 51 pet. Any light ment running right now will tell you that holding an oj pet is iffy at best, and can not be reliably controlled.

The problem is worse if you aren't full light spec. if you were to run light as a secondary spec line and charm a gray pet for possible mez breaks (a common tactic on live) the success percentage gets even worse. Currently my mentalist is level 43 and only has 4 in light. Using the above formula:

(43 x .66 = 28.38, rounded down to 28) + ((4+3 from gear = 7) x .33 = 2.31, rounded down to 2)

28 + 2 = 30

Even with that crappy sub spec I should be able to hold a gray level 30. I cant. I cant hold a level 20, 100% resist rate. I cant hold a level TEN, also 100% resist rate.

I want to help in a meaningful way without just crying in the forum, and I really wish I had more data to offer. However I no longer play live, and everything I've posted has been plastered to death online for well over a decade so this really shouldn't be new information. I tried multiple specs during beta, and these issues were mentioned then by myself and a number of others. I just don't know what else to do, but as-is the class is unreliable as a pet user. And that's a damn shame. :(

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15821
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Feb 16, 2017 15:31

Live offers trial accounts for two weeks. On Pendragon you can quickly get your char setup for tests. Would love to see more data on this.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

User avatar
Genjiro
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 1545
Joined: Jun 09, 2016 21:26

Postby Genjiro » Feb 16, 2017 16:03

DaytonChambers wrote:
pweet wrote:That formula doesn't make sense. It is a stochastic problem.


Lemme break it down.

That formula again is: Charm Level = (Mentalist Level X .66) + ((Light Spec + Spec Modifier) X .33)

So, using the above formula and rounding down on all values to be conservative, and plugging in a RR1 mentalist, level 50, specced 45 in light, with +11 to light from gear:

(50 x .66 = 33) + ((45+11=56) x.33 = 18.48, or 18)

so... 33 + 18 = 51

The formula says that a level 50 RR1 Ment with 45+11 light spec should be able to reliably hold a level 51 pet. Any light ment running right now will tell you that holding an oj pet is iffy at best, and can not be reliably controlled.

The problem is worse if you aren't full light spec. if you were to run light as a secondary spec line and charm a gray pet for possible mez breaks (a common tactic on live) the success percentage gets even worse. Currently my mentalist is level 43 and only has 4 in light. Using the above formula:

(43 x .66 = 28.38, rounded down to 28) + ((4+3 from gear = 7) x .33 = 2.31, rounded down to 2)

28 + 2 = 30

Even with that crappy sub spec I should be able to hold a gray level 30. I cant. I cant hold a level 20, 100% resist rate. I cant hold a level TEN, also 100% resist rate.

I want to help in a meaningful way without just crying in the forum, and I really wish I had more data to offer. However I no longer play live, and everything I've posted has been plastered to death online for well over a decade so this really shouldn't be new information. I tried multiple specs during beta, and these issues were mentioned then by myself and a number of others. I just don't know what else to do, but as-is the class is unreliable as a pet user. And that's a damn shame. :(


If you are interested in joining the research, please contact me via PM.
We are currently doing live tests with the Minstrel class since the Mentalist got his pulsing charm spell removed :?
News || Getting Started || Rules || Issue Tracker
Coloured text represents my personal opinion and is not associated with Uthgard Staff nor is it an official statement.

Enrick
Guardian
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Jan 28, 2017 17:33

Postby Enrick » Feb 17, 2017 15:10

Blue wrote:Live offers trial accounts for two weeks. On Pendragon you can quickly get your char setup for tests. Would love to see more data on this.


I'll take a look at this and post my results in the tracker issue.

I've had my eye on it for a while, hoping for it to be address. Thanks for letting us know that you need more data before making a change.

I'm a 50 light ment, 48+12 light (went higher in light specifically for a boost to charming). In theory (if that formula is correct) I should be able to charm level 53 mobs. I have trouble holding a 51, and 52 Ellyl sages are uncontrollable. I used to have a higher RR light ment on live with only 45 into light (I can't remember the exact stats) who could charm sages and seers. Anecdotal evidence I can't back up, but I'll take a look later.

User avatar
Blue
Developer
Developer
 
Posts: 15821
Joined: Apr 22, 2005 00:00

Postby Blue » Feb 17, 2017 16:32

Enrick wrote:I'll take a look at this and post my results in the tracker issue.

Please contact Genjiro as he does research in that area.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later.

"It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something
is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure."


Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard"
Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand"

[Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????"
BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..."

Enrick
Guardian
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Jan 28, 2017 17:33

Postby Enrick » Feb 18, 2017 15:01

Blue wrote:
Enrick wrote:I'll take a look at this and post my results in the tracker issue.

Please contact Genjiro as he does research in that area.


Unfortunately, I can't level to 50 on Pendragon on a trail account unless I have a level 50 on live. There may be another way but there is no documentation or any NPCs or mob I can kill which will do that for me.

I'll do what I can on Uth by removing +spell items and contact Genjiro with my findings, though this won't help much in determining whether the behaviour on Uth is 'live-like' or '1.65-like'.

User avatar
Juri
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 766
Joined: Mar 10, 2011 03:18

Postby Juri » Feb 18, 2017 17:03

Enrick wrote:
Blue wrote:
Enrick wrote:I'll take a look at this and post my results in the tracker issue.

Please contact Genjiro as he does research in that area.


Unfortunately, I can't level to 50 on Pendragon on a trail account unless I have a level 50 on live. There may be another way but there is no documentation or any NPCs or mob I can kill which will do that for me.


That's not true! I just rolled an animist on a new pendragon account and found the NPC right inside TNN. Check the capital areas!

PreviousNext

Return to Mentalist

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Sunday, 02. March 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff