twohand bonus and parry
|
You kidding, right? Ive looked up the releasenotes, and here you go, just by reading this, one might get the idea how it worked before 1.87.
http://www.camelotherald.com/article.php?id=402 Just below the craft change notes. Last edited by Satz on Mar 04, 2010 17:39, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
This is basic I think it's implemented in DOL.
From Grab Bag: "Dual wielders throw an extra wrinkle in. You have half the chance of shield blocking a dual wielder as you do a player using only one weapon. Your chance to parry is halved if you are facing a two handed weapon, as opposed to a one handed weapon." Uthgard till 2003!
|
|
So there's another reason why 2h damage is so low compared to 1h ? I thought it was because the 2h bonus is missing. Or it was missing and you fixed it in the past few days. [23:53] <@ref^> i once hugged a girl you know
[20:03] <@ref^^> I AM NOT STUPID [20:03] <@ref^^> but i am retardd |
|
Its implemented on Uthgard. In DOL its not or was removed.
What I find interesting when looking at the parry code is that there is a penalty on parry when facing dual wielders. From the patch notes and grab bag it looks to me that dual wield should penalize evade and block only. Any ideas or sources/proof? @Toblerone: 2H bonus is in for quite some time. It can also be checked with debug output. It should be visible on damage cap and damage in general, when using same DPS and SPD. It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later. "It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure." Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard" Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand" [Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????" BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..." |
|
Uh that's quite the opposite. Parry chance should be increased when facing dual weilders, just like evade and block are lowered.
I dunno about 2h bonus, even if it is in there's something terribly wrong with the damage of 2h weapons. I cry when I hit for 200ish with a fully buffed hero with 50+17 LW ^^ Last edited by Toblerone on Mar 04, 2010 19:47, edited 1 time in total.
[23:53] <@ref^> i once hugged a girl you know
[20:03] <@ref^^> I AM NOT STUPID [20:03] <@ref^^> but i am retardd |
|
I two-shot Zerkers
|
|
|
|
I asked about parry when facing Dual wielders.
Parry is halved on Uthgard for DW attacks. Sorry to hijack this thread but I need proof that it SHOULD halve parry for DW attacks or the code must be removed. It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later. "It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure." Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard" Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand" [Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????" BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..." |
|
# of attackers = 2 when facing dual wield so yes it is halfed (atleast thats always how i understood why dual wield cuts block/evade/parry chances to half) live tests had to be made though to ensure this is true (if it hasn't been changed) |
|
Yes livetests needed. Don't think dual wielders count as 2 attackers in general. They only mention evade rate and block rate.
It's done when it's done. Thanks for your patience.
Every bug gets fixed. Sooner or later. "It is an inescapable law of nature that the amount of satisfaction one gains from achieving something is related to how hard it is and easy things can only elicit a fleeting superficial sort of pleasure." Blue says, "you used macro tools or macro keyboard" Pala says, "i am disabled. and i have a mechanic left hand that can be programed. its hard to play woith one hand" [Appeal] Bxxxxxxxx: "why is RA first aid cann man i stealth use and not unstealth cann man ra if man use unstealth ?????????" BannedUser: "i was not using automate game action my hand was fall on keyboard during i was sleep .... i was completly fall on keyboard ..." |
|
Crude and simple explanation, but wrong. Parry should in fact have a bonus when fighting against dual wielders and penalty vs 2h. [23:53] <@ref^> i once hugged a girl you know
[20:03] <@ref^^> I AM NOT STUPID [20:03] <@ref^^> but i am retardd |
|
No defskill has a bonus when facing any enemy(beside lower level).
Aswell as evade and parry cap at 50%. Most classes that can spec parry actually do reach 50% quite easy... Ill logic... If parry would have a bonus when facing dual wielders, why shouldnt block or evade have a bonus when facing 2h, then? No patchnote states anything about removing that bonus, so go check live now, if you encounter some kind of valid bonus, it should get implemented then. |
|
In fact, evade has the same bonus vs 2h that parry has vs dual wielders. 2h in itself also had a small bonus increase to parry chance. This is old research, I remember it from before SI. Unfortunately I doubt we could find any data on it ^^ [23:53] <@ref^> i once hugged a girl you know
[20:03] <@ref^^> I AM NOT STUPID [20:03] <@ref^^> but i am retardd |
|
Dual Wield SHOULD DEFINATELY NOT halve Parry. That is a fact and that code should be removed as soon as possible. However I personally do not have any sources of it also being increased against Dual Wielders. I'll try to find some and post it here Btw I have to say that it's good to see you checking all this stuff Blue, nice work. |
|
Grab Bag:
http://www.camelotherald.com/more/453.shtml
Nothing else is mentioned in that grab bag. This could even be used as an argument for that claim many people made that DW wasn't meant to halve evade, especially as it was fixed (to not halve it) in 1.87. |
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests