Hi i just wanted 2 know on a nother forum it talks about classes and things so on the Cabalist it sayes only melee pet for now so what of the pets is the melle 1? or is thare more than 1 you can us or is it like bd and sm with only the lvl 1 pets?

at the moment you have the one that stun and the one with DD casts. the other ones will just fight in melee without any effect

Amber and Ruby Simulacrum are, like pana said, implemented.

Amber Simulacrum casts it's stun, Ruby casts its fireDD.

Melee dmg is low atm, pets are more rupter than anything else (ruby fireDD is ok).

The rest will follow in time.

Greetz
Kronos

first hand infor´s..from a top 4 cabby here on uth

amber simulacrum is nearly complete. it casts its stun in close combat BUT it does not buff itself with his Str/con selfbuff.

Ruby simulacrum is complete. it casts the fire DD as it should. if its interruppted its goes over to close combat (melee)

Saffier simulacrum ONLY MELEE

emerald simulacrum ONLY MELEE

jade simulacrum will stay forever without ability here on uthgard since the self-damageshield it has, was implemented on live in patch 1.87.

Musi I knew that saffire simu procs a istant lifetap sometime, while emerald istant cast a low dmg dot (like vw one)

Sure, but as now three people (including a top4 cabba) said, only the Amber and Ruby Sims are implemented. The rest will come in time .

Kronos

patch 1.60

"- Increased damage on Jade Simulacrum's damage shield self buff. "

http://daoc-guide.4players.de/index.php ... &Itemid=56

how could dammage shield be increased in 1.60 if it's a 1.89 ability?

well...i thought so since on daoc-pedia its called useless pet up to 1.87...and because of my lazyness i did not searched all patchnots for cabby.

Jade simulacrum is useless in rvr because dmg shield only break mezz. But in exp that dmg shield stacks with focus one.

Demiurgo wrote:Jade simulacrum is useless in rvr because dmg shield only break mezz. But in exp that dmg shield stacks with focus one.

root*

Yep sorry yesterday I said too many times "don't break mezz" so I confused