Oops no more keeps to take with your animist

Talk about your RvR experience here
Shenyen
Warder
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Mar 09, 2018 03:43

Postby Shenyen » Jun 20, 2020 01:39

It's nice of you to help us Albs to retake our keeps, but isn't what you've been doing until 30min ago against the rules?

Since 75 minutes ago, in the time span of about 30 minutes, 4 keeps in the Alb frontier have been taken by the forces of Albion, including 2 keeps (Berk and Surs) in just 3 minutes, BUT: Albion didn't have anyone in the frontier zones, not even anons (/who all and /who displayed the same numbers and nobody was in Forest Sauvage or Pennine Mountains).

So I wanted to see who was taking our keeps and what did I see?

I arrived at Boldiam just in time to witness a purple Man at Arms (a border keep guard of Albion, iirc) running around Boldiam and occasionally hitting Maglan https://daoc.scheffel.it/char/Maglan.
A few moments later Caer Boldiam was taken by "The Forces of Albion", but I am absolutely certain that I was the only Alb nearby at the time, with at least the outer door of Boldiam being closed.
And as a reminder: There were not enough Albs online in that zone, not even anon, to take that keep.

So what I believe: Maglan pulled border keep guards from either Snowdonia Keep or Forest Sauvage Keep through the Alb frontier, pulled it close enough to the Hibernian (!) Keep Lord and waited until the very strong guard killed a keep lord of HIS OWN REALM.

Why he did that?
There are many possible reasons:
1. Hibs didn't have any more Alb keeps to take and maybe don't want to take Mid keeps, so by (ab)using this tactic, they have more keeps to take this night.
2. Hibs don't want to give Albs the possibility to reraid our own keeps for RPs
3. He may be an :gaga: :gaga: :gaga:

If it's 1., I am very certain that this violates rule 6 and also kinda 8 of the "Access to the game server and in game behaviour":
Rule 6. "Abuse of bugs, exploits and obvious game errors is forbidden. If you are not sure whether something is a bug or an error then please ask the Uthgard staff for help and clarification. Bugs have to be reported."
Rule 8. "Intentional cooperation of players between different realms is not allowed. This includes arranged duels and realm point farming."

The game designers and also the devs of Uthgard never designed the keep take mechanics in a way that a realm can give up their own keep and give it back to the original owner of said keep, so this is obviously an exploit and if you use it to retake the keep later (actually any time later, as long as the Mids didn't take it in the meantime) for RP gain, you actually farmed RPs.

Maglan Keeptake.PNG


Oh, it started again..., now Eras was taken...

Keeptakes.PNG
Shenyen
Sihunjan
Corvette
Others

Cirath
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Jul 19, 2017 00:11

Postby Cirath » Jun 20, 2020 02:20

#3 is correct. Golani does wierd things when he gets bored. As hard as it is for the Alb mind to comprehend, Hibs really could care less about keeptake rps.

Shenyen
Warder
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Mar 09, 2018 03:43

Postby Shenyen » Jun 20, 2020 03:03

It doesn't matter if he likes to do weird things, as soon as those things interfere with Realm vs Realm combat the behaviour has to be within the rules of Uthgard.

Hibs raiding Alb keeps: Perfectly fine, unless the keeptake mechanics are exploited in a way that isn't intended by the designers of the game and this server.
So I think taking Alb keeps with a single animist is exploiting and I don't ****** care if you care about keeptake rps or not - you get RPs for the keep and THAT'S IT!
The crime happend and nobody cares if you were happy when you got 450rps or not - you got ****** 450rps for that keep.

And what happened an hour ago is the same:
Hibs can't just pull Albion guards to a Hib keep so that the guards take the keep for Albion.

That's a weird way of crossrealming and is using game mechanics (border keep guards killing players AND NPCs from other realms) in an inproper way.

There's a realm switch timer to prevent Player A from logging to his Alb A to take a Hib Keep, logging back to Hib A to take it back, logging back to Alb A to ta.... and so on.

Rule 7. "Switching to other realms is strictly limited to prevent cross realming. Bypassing the restrictions in place is forbidden."

Now that you're taking keeps with a single animist AND returning it to the Albs via border keep guard kiting, what's there to stop a single Hib from taking a keep with his animist, flipping it back via his bard and border keep guard, taking it back with his animist and so on...?

By kiting an Albion guard to the keep, he's certainly bypassing the realm switch restriction to crossrealm in a weird way.

You guys already ruined dragon raids for all of us, now you're ruining RvR.

I wonder if anyone of you ever stops and thinks "Am I being a dick right now or is it acceptable behavior?"?

But hey, now you got Drastic, who answers this question with every single move he makes.
I guess he'll fit right in.

PS: My "Breton Warder" minstrel was one of the "trashcans" who killed his group at HMG in Hadrians.
Shenyen
Sihunjan
Corvette
Others

User avatar
Ithiggi
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 460
Joined: Dec 05, 2008 01:00
Location: Alberta Canada

Postby Ithiggi » Jun 20, 2020 03:38

450 rps ? not! If they took the gates down ya but for just killing the lord its would be 150 rps

User avatar
kinthos
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Sep 03, 2009 00:00

Postby kinthos » Jun 20, 2020 05:05

Image
- Inqy/Spymistress/Sly -
GM of "eXPedient demise" | Slave of "Crows of Winter"

User avatar
fremster
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Aug 10, 2010 00:00

Postby fremster » Jun 20, 2020 07:37

Shenyen wrote:You guys already ruined dragon raids for all of us, now you're ruining RvR.



This is funny. Dragons were removed because the GM did not want them being killed with less than 26 people, NOT because of an abuse in mechanics.

It's funny how the SI mob in ALB can still be farmed with 1 person and that hasn't been removed. I am not sure the initial intention was that a lvl 60+ mob with 12 purp aggros could be solo'd. Why hasn't that been removed long ago?

I'll answer it for you.
Because that is alb and not hib.

Shenyen
Warder
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Mar 09, 2018 03:43

Postby Shenyen » Jun 20, 2020 10:00

Hey kinthos, didn't you pick the wrong realm if all you're good for in a discussion is being a Troll?
troll.jpg
Shenyen
Sihunjan
Corvette
Others

User avatar
kinthos
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Sep 03, 2009 00:00

Postby kinthos » Jun 20, 2020 12:39

Shenyen wrote:Hey kinthos, didn't you pick the wrong realm if all you're good for in a discussion is being a Troll?
troll.jpg


I can't find a meme for this so you can have some words...

I think you'll find my images are precisely on point and capture the essence of the original poster and the following discussions.

Thank you for your query.
- Inqy/Spymistress/Sly -
GM of "eXPedient demise" | Slave of "Crows of Winter"

User avatar
m0e
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Jan 20, 2010 01:00

Postby m0e » Jun 20, 2020 13:24

fremster wrote:It's funny how the SI mob in ALB can still be farmed with 1 person and that hasn't been removed. I am not sure the initial intention was that a lvl 60+ mob with 12 purp aggros could be solo'd. Why hasn't that been removed long ago?

I'll answer it for you.
Because that is alb and not hib.


This is also the case for the Hib SI mob, you can easy kite kill him on your ranger - just sayin :-P

User avatar
Romu
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Feb 22, 2017 23:27

Postby Romu » Jun 20, 2020 20:06

Shenyen wrote:Hey kinthos, didn't you pick the wrong realm if all you're good for in a discussion is being a Troll?
troll.jpg


What do you expect from the Guild Master of the Guild where all the people of all recent exploits are from? He is most likely involved in everything.

Thanks for the investigation, everything is reported to the Uthgard Staff and we will see if they react.

User avatar
virulent-
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Jun 28, 2017 20:41

Postby virulent- » Jun 20, 2020 21:37

only way albs can top the weekly rp charts is if im playing on alb OR the albs somehow get hibs banned...pick ur poison
Drastic / Blademistaire / Kardashian
<Ravensworn> of Hibernia, Palomides 2001 - 2002 *** <Triggered> of Albion, Uthgard2 2017 - 2021

Cirath
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Jul 19, 2017 00:11

Postby Cirath » Jun 20, 2020 21:49

Romu wrote:
Shenyen wrote:Hey kinthos, didn't you pick the wrong realm if all you're good for in a discussion is being a Troll?
troll.jpg


What do you expect from the Guild Master of the Guild where all the people of all recent exploits are from? He is most likely involved in everything.

Thanks for the investigation, everything is reported to the Uthgard Staff and we will see if they react.



:roll:

Spare us the dramatics Romu.

Just because you don't like an animist taking keeps doesn't make it an exploit. The shrooms are placed using 100% legit ground targets in 100% legit locations. Can be easily targeted, killed, mezzed, etc. The animist is also extremely vulnerable while doing this. Just because Albs go on a Holy Crusade of outrage, shouting Exploit! Exploit! from the rooftops doesn't make it so. If some of these forum warriors would put half as much effort into RvR, and you know, go defend their keeps, they wouldn't be taken.

Frem has already explained the dragon situation. Don't be upset at hibs for working with what they have ( And NOT exploiting by the way), be angry that for some reason the staff decided to "fix" the hib dragon being killed by fewer players than intended by removing dragons from all realms.

I know you are just really upset that your days of logging in an Alb BG of 30+ twice a week and steamrolling any and all opposition on your way to easy PvE realmpoints are over. Sorry, not sorry.

albeyond
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Apr 03, 2017 19:29

Postby albeyond » Jun 20, 2020 22:41

You guys should be nicer to each other. You’re literally the only ones who play this game

User avatar
Romu
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 326
Joined: Feb 22, 2017 23:27

Postby Romu » Jun 20, 2020 23:35

Cirath wrote:Frem has already explained the dragon situation. Don't be upset at hibs for working with what they have ( And NOT exploiting by the way), be angry that for some reason the staff decided to "fix" the hib dragon being killed by fewer players than intended by removing dragons from all realms.


Dragon Situation is that Abydos told me it was an Exploit. Fremster explained nothing, he said it was no Exploit, but he does not say how he killed it. If it was no Exploit it should be no problem to tell everyone how you killed it.

Cirath
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 226
Joined: Jul 19, 2017 00:11

Postby Cirath » Jun 21, 2020 01:06



This is funny. Dragons were removed because the GM did not want them being killed with less than 26 people, NOT because of an abuse in mechanics.



Right there. Hib was told, after the fact, that Dragon was "meant to be killed by 24+ players." That was all the clarification I have seen.
Apparently Hibs Crime is not having enough players.

Get off your high horse. You stood on the throats of Hib and Mid for months with your population imbalance. Noone in Hib or Mid feels bad for Albion.

PreviousNext

Return to Realm versus Realm

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

Sunday, 02. March 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff