Your opinions

Here you can comment on news articles.
User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » Apr 16, 2010 13:00

Want you compensate? Use pots and charges too. It´s easy.

You said in live they have patches. Live daoc is moving to turn in wow, all have same abilities...

Kaltess wrote:MMO are not made for solo.If you want to solo,change game or select your target.If visible classes don't run solo,than don't run solo too.Stop to want "i win vs all".


If i must contemplate you game play, why you cant contemplate my gamplay and other players too? If you want epic battles go emain to have them. When i want my 1vs1 combats i go to other zones to have them. Staff should contemplate 1vs1 community.

User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » Apr 16, 2010 13:04

zaszeadora wrote:
vangonaj wrote:Buffbot isn´t buffpot/charge. If all people who are lazy to craft them and farm them, want see the difference, isn´t reason to remove or nerf them again. Pots and charges were nerfed 2 times yet, is enough. Why all want play custom daoc and not real daoc?

Why not go to first daoc version, when all people used epic armor only? Why not remove all craft?


Tell me the difference between buffbot and duo tank suporter killing solos?


On Live daoc ppl can use buffbots and patches are done thinking about that, here you can see assasins killing friars easily and on OLD daoc friars was feared by assasins cause they was THE rogue killer.

Later all ppl began using Buffbots and the patch circle changed, wardes got celerity and spec heald, shield, friars got rej styles and more specpoints to compensate

On utghard assasins get the buff bot buffs( str/cons charge and dex quic one) but we dont compensate this unbalance.


:lol: This must be a noob friar then. A well played friar is one of the strongest melee classes. Sorry but comparing red bases with 20 value pots is just ridiculous. The friar enchantment line offers so much more.

When you compare charges with the pf line:

Damadd: useless can be charged for a far superior version that hurts more
Spec AF: better value than the nerfed charge one and that means it is useful.
Base str: very good for blade spec and decent for piercing
Speedshout: very good
D/Q: It is ok unless you dont spend 48 points and but lack of bow damage.

User avatar
Musikus
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1753
Joined: Jul 22, 2007 00:00
Location: Achau (bei Wien)

Postby Musikus » Apr 16, 2010 13:24

Ronian wrote:
zaszeadora wrote:
vangonaj wrote:Buffbot isn´t buffpot/charge. If all people who are lazy to craft them and farm them, want see the difference, isn´t reason to remove or nerf them again. Pots and charges were nerfed 2 times yet, is enough. Why all want play custom daoc and not real daoc?

Why not go to first daoc version, when all people used epic armor only? Why not remove all craft?


Tell me the difference between buffbot and duo tank suporter killing solos?


On Live daoc ppl can use buffbots and patches are done thinking about that, here you can see assasins killing friars easily and on OLD daoc friars was feared by assasins cause they was THE rogue killer.

Later all ppl began using Buffbots and the patch circle changed, wardes got celerity and spec heald, shield, friars got rej styles and more specpoints to compensate

On utghard assasins get the buff bot buffs( str/cons charge and dex quic one) but we dont compensate this unbalance.


:lol: This must be a noob friar then. A well played friar is one of the strongest melee classes. Sorry but comparing red bases with 20 value pots is just ridiculous. The friar enchantment line offers so much more.

When you compare charges with the pf line:

Damadd: useless can be charged for a far superior version that hurts more
Spec AF: better value than the nerfed charge one and that means it is useful.
Base str: very good for blade spec and decent for piercing
Speedshout: very good
D/Q: It is ok unless you dont spend 48 points and but lack of bow damage.


well, not so long ago all dual wielding stealthes had a huge (bug-related) advantage against friars...their dualwield halfed the parry of the friar which was wrong...some weeks ago changelog statted this bug to be fixed now. (dual wield no longer half parry).

User avatar
Kaltess
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Dec 17, 2009 01:00
Location: France

Postby Kaltess » Apr 16, 2010 13:50

vangonaj wrote:Tell me the difference between buffbot and duo tank suporter killing solos?


2 people playing.

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » Apr 16, 2010 14:00

Kaltess wrote:
vangonaj wrote:Tell me the difference between buffbot and duo tank suporter killing solos?


2 people playing.


Yes fullbuffed tank killing 1 solo while this solo cant do nothing. The same situation like buffbot.

User avatar
Astealoth
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 924
Joined: Jul 10, 2008 00:00
Location: Upstate NY

Postby Astealoth » Apr 16, 2010 14:48

personally i dont think this discussion is about buff pots at all. it seems more like a masked discussion about how powerful rangers are right now. the buff potions aren't the problem, it's their extremely nice RA set they have access to. when rangers don't have PD, even with their bugged damage tables, its more of a fair fight against other stealthers. i fight rangers who don't even take the time to play well and still win because my PA does (-422).

User avatar
Ironberg
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Feb 01, 2008 01:00

Postby Ironberg » Apr 16, 2010 15:14

removing buff potions is just an idiotic suggestion, everyone can get them, its no unfair advantage..

User avatar
Seyha
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Apr 25, 2009 00:00
Location: Schadenfreude City, USA

Postby Seyha » Apr 16, 2010 15:16

Ironberg wrote:removing buff potions is just an idiotic suggestion, everyone can get them, its no unfair advantage..


If everyone has them, then why does everyone need them?
Luzifa: freak
Luzifa: delete your freak
Luzifa: seyha why you always coward?
Luzifa: running valkyn freak

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » Apr 16, 2010 15:21

Seyha wrote:
Ironberg wrote:removing buff potions is just an idiotic suggestion, everyone can get them, its no unfair advantage..


If everyone has them, then why does everyone need them?


If you need fight vs duo suporter/tank.... they help vs suporter buff advantage.

nixian
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5450
Joined: May 19, 2006 00:00

Postby nixian » Apr 16, 2010 15:24

vangonaj wrote:
Seyha wrote:
Ironberg wrote:removing buff potions is just an idiotic suggestion, everyone can get them, its no unfair advantage..


If everyone has them, then why does everyone need them?


If you need fight vs duo suporter/tank.... they help vs suporter buff advantage.


tbh i dont see why this is an argument to keep buff potions..

if you go solo vs a tank/caster + supporter.. your supposed to loose..

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » Apr 16, 2010 15:25

Not ever. And if are duo vs duo or trio vs trio... 1 group has suporter other no.

Samy
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 148
Joined: May 12, 2005 00:00

Postby Samy » Apr 16, 2010 15:27

I don't know if it was said already, but I 'd like to add, that I heard from many side, that the wizards damage is not working livelike yet.

As you can hardly see there are anyway not really many wizards playing, yet. But I saw, that the damage is already working for the lower levels, but getting just a low bonus at the higher levels.

Maybe this can be added to the damage recalculations, if there is time.


Btw.: Nice work! I 'd like to help, I will have a look, how that may be possible for me.

User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » Apr 16, 2010 15:30

Astealoth wrote:personally i dont think this discussion is about buff pots at all. it seems more like a masked discussion about how powerful rangers are right now. the buff potions aren't the problem, it's their extremely nice RA set they have access to. when rangers don't have PD, even with their bugged damage tables, its more of a fair fight against other stealthers. i fight rangers who don't even take the time to play well and still win because my PA does (-422).


Maybe try CD after your PA and if the ranger has no purge up he should be dead no matter what type of pd he has. I cant understand how assassins can cry about PD and they have access to (in my opinion) one of the most strongest lines on Uthgard: the venom line
118 str/con debuff, disease which reduces the effectivness of ip and you also need "to waste" a second ability to have the full benefit and there is also the unbreakable snare and mighty viper3. So how can you cry about more physical resistance. :lol:

I recommend to roll or borrow a ranger and you will see how op it is. Consequently, I would trade anytime my pd vs poison line and evade7.


@Musikus
Friars parried a lot before the fix, more than other classes in my opinion. Together with high evade chance and resistant armor to piercing damage they had the best defense vs any ranger and pd couldnt compete with their defense at all. They still made more damage than any warrior and of course near speed cap.
Last edited by Ronian on Apr 16, 2010 15:40, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Seyha
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Apr 25, 2009 00:00
Location: Schadenfreude City, USA

Postby Seyha » Apr 16, 2010 15:38

Ronian, I didn't say anything about Friars. You have me confused friend. ^^
Luzifa: freak
Luzifa: delete your freak
Luzifa: seyha why you always coward?
Luzifa: running valkyn freak

User avatar
vangonaj
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2497
Joined: Sep 14, 2007 00:00
Location: Galpen

Postby vangonaj » Apr 16, 2010 16:03

Ronian wrote:I recommend to roll or borrow a ranger and you will see how op it is. Consequently, I would trade anytime my pd vs poison line and evade7.


Remember ranger was designed for bow and not for melee. And pd5 is insane if you dont spec viper3. But i agree if ranger has purge down after long stun he will die for sure, but only if he was stuned when he has 20% hp and when stun finish he cant use ip and rr5^^.

PreviousNext

Return to News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Thursday, 10. April 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff