Uthgard • View topic - The Grab Bag is back!

The Grab Bag is back!

317 posts • Page 4 of 22 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 22

relvinian Phoenix Knight Posts: 1722 Joined: Oct 16, 2012 08:25	by relvinian » Apr 14, 2015 03:21 As far as the population "cap" I am not sure if it will be a problem. I will say about Genesis or any other server, when it gets below 500 or so I feel like it is literally not worth playing on. Population is EVERYTHING in daoc. https://www.uthgard.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=37632 Players can greatly contribute to a server if you let them. Uthgard, still the best server. Thanks, Devs.

kildich Warder Posts: 30 Joined: Apr 13, 2013 02:21	by kildich » Apr 14, 2015 05:52 relvinian wrote:As far as the population "cap" I am not sure if it will be a problem. I will say about Genesis or any other server, when it gets below 500 or so I feel like it is literally not worth playing on. Population is EVERYTHING in daoc. I completely disagree, yes having population is nice. However I would rather have less people and have them be good and decent people vs a lot of people who are jerks. Population is NOT everything.

shurick Myrmidon Posts: 116 Joined: Oct 25, 2014 19:20	by shurick » Apr 14, 2015 11:31 kildich wrote: I completely disagree, yes having population is nice. However I would rather have less people and have them be good and decent people vs a lot of people who are jerks. Population is NOT everything. Err what? You just lost me.. who was talking about being jerks or not being jerks? He was just commenting on a population level in general for a daoc server. The point you trying to make is absolutely irrelevant. Sarge - Healer Zulus - Berserker Alec / Aleck - Percival, Albion

devilsfury Warder Posts: 60 Joined: Feb 18, 2009 01:00	by devilsfury » Apr 14, 2015 14:37 shurick wrote: kildich wrote: I completely disagree, yes having population is nice. However I would rather have less people and have them be good and decent people vs a lot of people who are jerks. Population is NOT everything. Err what? You just lost me.. who was talking about being jerks or not being jerks? He was just commenting on a population level in general for a daoc server. The point you trying to make is absolutely irrelevant. What he was saying is that he would rather have a smaller population full of nice people than a big population full of jerks. Reading is fundamental.

aidoru Myrmidon Posts: 82 Joined: Jun 18, 2014 23:07	by aidoru » Apr 14, 2015 15:27 eta => ETA I'm trying to free your mind... But I can only show you the door. You're the one that has to walk through it.

shurick Myrmidon Posts: 116 Joined: Oct 25, 2014 19:20	by shurick » Apr 14, 2015 15:52 devilsfury wrote: shurick wrote: kildich wrote: I completely disagree, yes having population is nice. However I would rather have less people and have them be good and decent people vs a lot of people who are jerks. Population is NOT everything. Err what? You just lost me.. who was talking about being jerks or not being jerks? He was just commenting on a population level in general for a daoc server. The point you trying to make is absolutely irrelevant. What he was saying is that he would rather have a smaller population full of nice people than a big population full of jerks. Reading is fundamental. It gets too boring if you have a small server full of nice people. What is there to do? Hold hands and sing kumbaya together? I would rather have a server with a large population and I will take my chances in finding the right group of people to hang out with. Sarge - Healer Zulus - Berserker Alec / Aleck - Percival, Albion

devilsfury Warder Posts: 60 Joined: Feb 18, 2009 01:00	by devilsfury » Apr 14, 2015 16:24 I'm with you. If some people are jerk-offs, ill just find good people to group with and not worry about the others. Population is key to the health of the game, PvE and PvP!

devilsfury Warder Posts: 60 Joined: Feb 18, 2009 01:00	by devilsfury » Apr 14, 2015 18:48 So I take it that playing DAoC will be like 1.0? Download the full version of DAoC and then install the .dll file to dumb down the version???

Love me Babby Myrmidon Posts: 122 Joined: Jan 11, 2011 08:31 Location: California - Hells Anus Website	by Love me Babby » Apr 14, 2015 20:01 ETA? Uth2.0 2015?

Infinitum Gryphon Knight Posts: 236 Joined: Jan 11, 2013 01:36	by Infinitum » Apr 14, 2015 20:48 2016 is more likely The Lone Assassin Formerly: Infinitum - Uthgard 1 Infinitum Style: https://youtu.be/Xae13-nWnBw

DeathPizza Guardian Posts: 2 Joined: Mar 21, 2011 18:53	by DeathPizza » Apr 15, 2015 13:43 How's the anti-hack system/cheat detection? Currently DaoC Live is dwindling in population and is rampant with Radar and with the same people using it for upwards of months it doesn't seem like it'll go away. I think if you can capitalize on your system it would turn a lot of "Live" players to Uthgard for simply a cheat-free zone. XD

JimD Warder Posts: 17 Joined: Apr 15, 2015 22:15	by JimD » Apr 15, 2015 22:21 Will albs have 179 delve LT (like 1.65 patch) or the 149 delve lt (like 1.62)? also how will invig pots work? will they be 2mins again?

Nezix Phoenix Knight Posts: 1138 Joined: Oct 27, 2012 08:41	by Nezix » Apr 15, 2015 22:34 JimD wrote:Will albs have 179 delve LT (like 1.65 patch) or the 149 delve lt (like 1.62)? Should be 179 delve since the target is 1.65 I can't comment on invig duration though. Nezix - 50 Minstrel <The Band> Merlin: Arthur, what is best in life? Arthur: To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their Lurikeens.

Infinitum Gryphon Knight Posts: 236 Joined: Jan 11, 2013 01:36	by Infinitum » Apr 15, 2015 23:33 I can guarantee you that the duration of the invigoration potions will be 2 minutes as they were at 1.65. Potion timers were increased to 10 minutes in 1.85... Thus on relaunch the timers will be as they were at 1.65 patch level. Please find below the link to 1.85 patch notes talking about the increase: http://www.warcry.com/news/view/63981-D ... -Pendragon The Lone Assassin Formerly: Infinitum - Uthgard 1 Infinitum Style: https://youtu.be/Xae13-nWnBw

Baman Myrmidon Posts: 103 Joined: Feb 26, 2010 01:00	by Baman » Apr 16, 2015 01:23 DeathPizza wrote:How's the anti-hack system/cheat detection? Currently DaoC Live is dwindling in population and is rampant with Radar and with the same people using it for upwards of months it doesn't seem like it'll go away. I think if you can capitalize on your system it would turn a lot of "Live" players to Uthgard for simply a cheat-free zone. XD I'm almost 100% certain they had the anti-radar figured out on Uthgard. I remember what it was like to get radared on live on my scout and that never happened once in all my time soloing on uth. And I was even more hated on my minstrel than I was on my scout! Do you have any idea how many hours I spent alt tabbed afk in rvr zones waiting for RAs to come back up? A LOT. ...and every time I came back, no one had radared me.