Necro

Public communication platform for all Albion players.
User avatar
F8L3RR0R
Guardian
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Jun 10, 2009 00:00

Postby F8L3RR0R » Jun 22, 2010 14:45

been playin here off and on for several years was wondering if they are going to put necro in the game soon as it was my favorite retail classic class?

User avatar
Rector
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2744
Joined: Mar 02, 2006 01:00

Postby Rector » Jun 22, 2010 14:52

Not in the next months.
Maybe in the next years.
Maybe not at all.

User avatar
Lintu
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1188
Joined: Oct 11, 2008 00:00

Postby Lintu » Jun 22, 2010 19:45

They said its planned with high priority. But honestly.. noone believes in it anymore. 3 years ago we had almost the same situation here. "coming soon" ;)
My Albion:

Chars: 50 Minstrel, 50 Infiltrator, 50 Paladin, 50 Reaver, 50 Theurgist, 50 Scout, 50 Friar, 50 Sorcerer, 50 Cleric, 50 Wizard, 50 Mercenary, 48 Cabalist, 48 Armsman

Crafting: LGM Alchemist, LGM Armorcrafter, LGM Tailor, LEG Spellcrafter, LEG Weaponcrafter, LEG Fletcher

User avatar
hopscotsch
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Apr 12, 2009 00:00

Postby hopscotsch » Jun 23, 2010 00:10

Necros would be fun. Hope they get implemented sometime.

User avatar
Lexi
Warder
 
Posts: 11
Joined: May 29, 2010 00:00

Postby Lexi » Jun 23, 2010 09:36

I cant really understand why they dont want to implement it. It would for sure dont destroy ballance, since Necro was not a great PvP char, much more only for farming/PvE. Are they afraid that Albs will have a bit more money? :lol:
<img src="http://metty.the-bart.org/other/daoc/sig.php?name=Lexi&s=6"> <img src="http://metty.the-bart.org/other/daoc/sig.php?name=Licht&s=6">

nixian
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5450
Joined: May 19, 2006 00:00

Postby nixian » Jun 23, 2010 09:43

Lexi wrote:I cant really understand why they dont want to implement it. It would for sure dont destroy ballance, since Necro was not a great PvP char, much more only for farming/PvE. Are they afraid that Albs will have a bit more money? :lol:



It annoys me when players blame staff of being biased..

there is 1 reason for necros not being implemented:


It is not an easy thing to do!


So stop the paranoia please.. necros will be implemented, when staff have time and desire to work on a huge project.

User avatar
Ronian
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 01:00

Postby Ronian » Jun 23, 2010 12:19

Lexi wrote:I cant really understand why they dont want to implement it. It would for sure dont destroy ballance, since Necro was not a great PvP char, much more only for farming/PvE. Are they afraid that Albs will have a bit more money? :lol:


Albs already have the best farming char = cabalist. And better goldspots than for example hib.

User avatar
Hildorien
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Aug 21, 2008 00:00

Postby Hildorien » Jun 23, 2010 16:10

nixian wrote:
Lexi wrote:I cant really understand why they dont want to implement it. It would for sure dont destroy ballance, since Necro was not a great PvP char, much more only for farming/PvE. Are they afraid that Albs will have a bit more money? :lol:



It annoys me when players blame staff of being biased..

there is 1 reason for necros not being implemented:


It is not an easy thing to do!


So stop the paranoia please.. necros will be implemented, when staff have time and desire to work on a huge project.

Lol.We all know here when they added Animist,it was %60 spells was not working.And there is still sm pets are buged!
Yes its hard job to do may be but if you are adding animist for hibs,you can do it same in albs too.
ImageImage
Image
Image

User avatar
Xantham
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Oct 26, 2008 00:00
Location: Dank Meme Dominon

Postby Xantham » Jun 23, 2010 17:00

Ronia wrote:Albs already have the best farming char = cabalist. And better goldspots than for example hib.


-necros are easily the best farming class over cabalists bro

F8L3RR0R wrote:been playin here off and on for several years was wondering if they are going to put necro in the game soon as it was my favorite retail classic class?


-And necros came in SI

Braxis
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Jun 03, 2009 00:00

Postby Braxis » Jun 23, 2010 19:23

Hildorien wrote:Lol.We all know here when they added Animist,it was %60 spells was not working.And there is still sm pets are buged!
Yes its hard job to do may be but if you are adding animist for hibs,you can do it same in albs too.

Not to mention cabby pets that are either not implemented (save for skin) or are grossly bugged.

But hey, what do I know? Whats most important is that we have toa...I mean taj... :lol:
nixian wrote:semi classic state --> full classic state = evolving

User avatar
macil22
Warder
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Jan 18, 2008 01:00

Postby macil22 » Jun 23, 2010 19:52

Braxis wrote:
Hildorien wrote:Lol.We all know here when they added Animist,it was %60 spells was not working.And there is still sm pets are buged!
Yes its hard job to do may be but if you are adding animist for hibs,you can do it same in albs too.

Not to mention cabby pets that are either not implemented (save for skin) or are grossly bugged.

But hey, what do I know? Whats most important is that we have toa...I mean taj... :lol:


Well I'd love to roll up a necro, and have cab pets finished but don't get mad because they worked on animist first. They don't have enough programmers to implement everything at the same time. Something has to be first, something has to be last. Necro and bonedancer are obviously going to come after because they are more complicated.

Also this is a classic server. If you were new here you would expect certain things, SI classes being among them. But what features would give you an overall impression of whether or not this server is classic? New Frontiers is not classic, NF RAs are not classic. Having classes that didn't belong, such as vamp or heretic, would make you think this is not classic. Luckily the last one isn't an issue at all here. On the other hand a missing feature such as a particular class may be a disappointment, but it will not make the server seem non classic. The point is if you look at the big picture they have to take care of certain features before others.

As for Taj, I have a feeling it was a few people working on that zone long term and when it was done they introduced it to the server. Its not like the whole staff was furiously working on it for 2 years while neglecting everything else. And maybe the people who worked on Tajendi volunteered to do just that because it was interesting to them. So staff can either let them contribute something or say no and possibly get nothing. What I am trying to say is the work put into Tajendi may have had very little impact on the development of other aspects of the server, we have no way of knowing.


Return to Albion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

Sunday, 20. April 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff