Berserker Spec

Public communication platform for all Midgard players.
User avatar
Magarau
Guardian
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 01:00

Postby Magarau » Feb 07, 2010 02:12

Hi all.
I've been searching on forums for a Berserker spec thread for a while and haven't found any threads, So I'm making this one.

My berserker is coming up on lvl 40 and I'm not sure what I should do for his respec.

I am currently spec'ed into Axe and LA, but I have had a lot of people ask me why I went that way.

So is Sword, LA better? What way should I go? How many points should I put into each skill?

I'm looking for a good rvr spec.

-Thanks

User avatar
Neju
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 11, 2009 00:00

Postby Neju » Feb 07, 2010 02:13

Think hammer is a good way to go for RvR, gives you option to backsnare style which is very helpful

User avatar
Force
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Oct 22, 2009 00:00

Postby Force » Feb 07, 2010 03:06

If I were you I would go hammer, so 50 hammer (so you max your style dmg when using the hammer back snare) 50 LA rest in parry.


If you were planning on soloing a lot you might consider axe for the front chain and anytime ASD, but doublefrost is basically the same dmg as the front chain and easier to land.

User avatar
Magarau
Guardian
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Feb 07, 2010 01:00

Postby Magarau » Feb 07, 2010 03:24

Force wrote:If I were you I would go hammer, so 50 hammer (so you max your style dmg when using the hammer back snare) 50 LA rest in parry.


If you were planning on soloing a lot you might consider axe for the front chain and anytime ASD, but doublefrost is basically the same dmg as the front chain and easier to land.


Ok that looks interesting. Might try that out.
Thanks

User avatar
hopscotsch
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Apr 12, 2009 00:00

Postby hopscotsch » Feb 07, 2010 12:15

50 Hammer, 50 LA

Brooms
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Dec 18, 2009 01:00

Postby Brooms » Feb 10, 2010 17:07

hopscotsch wrote:50 Hammer, 50 LA


This.

Conquer is better than anything axe or sword has to offer. If Ragnarok was like the live version, I would go sword.

Provoke is rediculously low endo usage :>
Team Awesome/Cobra Kai

Forge (World of Tanks NA server)

Toblerone
Banned
 
Posts: 1071
Joined: Jan 27, 2010 01:00
Location: Croatia

Postby Toblerone » Feb 10, 2010 17:17

I also playing slam tanks on both albion and hibernia encourage mid tanks to use provoke as much as possible!

User avatar
hopscotsch
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Apr 12, 2009 00:00

Postby hopscotsch » Feb 10, 2010 17:25

Toblerone wrote:I also playing slam tanks on both albion and hibernia encourage mid tanks to use provoke as much as possible!


Why?

User avatar
SirTorian
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Feb 14, 2009 01:00

Postby SirTorian » Feb 10, 2010 18:08

hopscotsch wrote:
Toblerone wrote:I also playing slam tanks on both albion and hibernia encourage mid tanks to use provoke as much as possible!


Why?



Because of the medium defence penalty. it will make it easier for them to not miss with slam :P

User avatar
hopscotsch
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Apr 12, 2009 00:00

Postby hopscotsch » Feb 10, 2010 18:14

SirTorian wrote:
hopscotsch wrote:
Toblerone wrote:I also playing slam tanks on both albion and hibernia encourage mid tanks to use provoke as much as possible!


Why?



Because of the medium defence penalty. it will make it easier for them to not miss with slam :P

Wouldnt it be better if they used conquer then? (high defense penalty)

Toblerone
Banned
 
Posts: 1071
Joined: Jan 27, 2010 01:00
Location: Croatia

Postby Toblerone » Feb 10, 2010 18:20

Because conquer isn't a loleasymode anytimer with almost no endu cost.

User avatar
hopscotsch
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 260
Joined: Apr 12, 2009 00:00

Postby hopscotsch » Feb 10, 2010 18:25

Toblerone wrote:Because conquer isn't a loleasymode anytimer with almost no endu cost.

Wouldnt those reasons make it even more beneficial for your slam tanks on both albion and hibernia?

(Take a look at endu costs: http://daoc.catacombs.com/display_style ... lityid=137 )

Toblerone
Banned
 
Posts: 1071
Joined: Jan 27, 2010 01:00
Location: Croatia

Postby Toblerone » Feb 10, 2010 23:07

Sense, you make none.

User avatar
Stormha
Myrmidon
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Aug 16, 2009 00:00

Postby Stormha » Feb 10, 2010 23:29

Toblerone wrote:Because conquer isn't a loleasymode anytimer with almost no endu cost.


totally wrong ... lol

Conquer is low endu cost as same as provoke + high defense penality

Toblerone
Banned
 
Posts: 1071
Joined: Jan 27, 2010 01:00
Location: Croatia

Postby Toblerone » Feb 10, 2010 23:34

Stormha wrote:
Toblerone wrote:Because conquer isn't a loleasymode anytimer with almost no endu cost.


totally wrong ... lol

Conquer is low endu cost as same as provoke + high defense penality


IS CONQUER AN ANYTIMER ? IS IT ??????????????????????


Read carefully -> think through -> write reply -> hit submit button. That's the way it goes.

Next

Return to Midgard

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 142 guests

Thursday, 05. December 2024

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff