Buddy and i are considering rolling one of these duos, problem is..which one? Warrior lacks all utility but can go defensive and take hits when the shaman is occupied...not to mention det 5...and of course, slam

skald on the other hand has tons of utility, can actually interrupt casters, but lacks stun..even so skald gets sos and allows us to pick our fights..even without a stun anything up to 2v3 shouldnt be too difficult..


thoughts? opinions? love to hear em

Why would u run warrior+skald?

Sham+warrior, sorry..the debate is skald or warrior to go with sham..i was tired

Skald+warrior works quite well as a duo. Legulas and me run duo when no people for grp or too less enemys are up.

a skald is definatly needed for duo, even if it would be just for the speed. I guess shaman would be even better than warrior for duo, but works ether way.

can i ask why u choosed this classes ? there are much more psbl for emainduo.

for u question : shamy + skald

Runental + skald with lw 2 :p

choose these duos basically for survivability..i think shaman+warrior is much harder to kill, but the only cc you have is mez and you cant choose your fights..skald has speed, which means you dont fight unless you want to, and the skald is buffed so it can actually dps plus with either of these duos we can get into groups in emain ^^

argh -.- only cc is root @ shaman+warrior, still tired

skald+sham duo has perma speed6 and is able to choose their fights, escaping easily from 8man groups or going into chicken mode with sos if you loose

Pouli wrote:Runental + skald with lw 2 :p

lw1- 34 aug now^^

Runental wrote:lw1- 34 aug now^^

Nooooooooooooooooooooo!!!

:p

skald + shaman.

50 LA shadowblade + 50 bow hunter, best emain duo possible