RvR-Revamp and common roadmap

Here you can comment on news articles.
User avatar
Red1
Warder
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Apr 01, 2010 00:00

Postby Red1 » May 24, 2010 22:46

I like the new BG's idea, but why stop at 34? Level 35 vs a 50 in the frontier is breakfast. Why not make a final BG 35-43 or something?

Old RA's...What can I say about this? I would rather the bugs that we are currently experiencing be hashed out then have to deal with 30 minute RA's. I guess Baman will only be camping the horse route every 30 minutes now with his purge/IP down for that long. This will destroy Mercs/Zerks/BM's. Guess is it time for me to put my Merc up for sale 8O

I play a ranger and know they are OP, but to implement old RA's and not fix current bow damage is retarded. Bow is not even viable on this server. Make it viable and you would see a massive decrease in melee rangers. I feel sorry for hunters who have a gimped bow and spear with old RA's. They might as well delete their characters. SB's/Infil's will get raped even more by rangers without viper. So this does not solve that problem.

Please look into improving what we have before going back to an old patch. Don't take the lazy way out thinking this will solve all our problems.

User avatar
Ithiggi
Gryphon Knight
 
Posts: 460
Joined: Dec 05, 2008 01:00
Location: Alberta Canada

Postby Ithiggi » May 24, 2010 22:53

Red1 wrote:I like the new BG's idea, but why stop at 34? Level 35 vs a 50 in the frontier is breakfast. Why not make a final BG 35-43 or something?

Old RA's...What can I say about this? I would rather the bugs that we are currently experiencing be hashed out then have to deal with 30 minute RA's. I guess Baman will only be camping the horse route every 30 minutes now with his purge/IP down for that long. This will destroy Mercs/Zerks/BM's. Guess is it time for me to put my Merc up for sale 8O

I play a ranger and know they are OP, but to implement old RA's and not fix current bow damage is retarded. Bow is not even viable on this server. Make it viable and you would see a massive decrease in melee rangers. I feel sorry for hunters who have a gimped bow and spear with old RA's. They might as well delete their characters. SB's/Infil's will get raped even more by rangers without viper. So this does not solve that problem.

Please look into improving what we have before going back to an old patch. Don't take the lazy way out thinking this will solve all our problems.

I have no idea where they got Caledonia 30-34 its was always 30-35 very easy to check.
Aye with theese changes I will prolly end up crafting and pveing my main is a hunter and well without MOS its a paper weight. No wait I can spec to see all hidded players every 30 min this might be fun every 30 min.
Last edited by Ithiggi on May 24, 2010 22:58, edited 1 time in total.

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » May 24, 2010 22:54

Red1 wrote:Old RA's...This will destroy Mercs/Zerks/BM's. Guess is it time for me to put my Merc up for sale 8O


ROFL. Because they lose Charge? 8O

Learn 2 play your Merc if you think he's useless without NF Charge tbfh.

User avatar
holsten-knight
Lion Knight
 
Posts: 4449
Joined: Jul 15, 2009 00:00
Location: Hamburg

Postby holsten-knight » May 24, 2010 22:55

nearsight WAS an insta i-win button, as was mezz (not in particular the first mezz, people were not that noob or stupid back then).

The old ra system was simply a first try, a lot of RA's crap, the RA's per realm unbalanced etc and was replaced with a better one.

Button mashing doesn't win fights with new RA's, it was no mistake bof, sos, pr etc where given to all realms, it was no mistake importance of CC got less (and even got less ever after with arte's, ML, CL...).

I play here for the classic feeling, but that doesn't mean i want to play in the buggy, unbalanced and unevolved classic surrounding.

But i guess there is no way to prevent this, so i will just wait for things to come and evaluate the given situation when it is live... and hope staff made a good and easy to install backup of how it was before :P

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » May 24, 2010 22:57

holsten-knight wrote:But i guess there is no way to prevent this, so i will just wait for things to come and evaluate the given situation when it is live... and hope staff made a good and easy to install backup of how it was before :P


So you can have your Skald do a faceplant on his keyboard on inc and still win fights?

No thanks.

User avatar
holsten-knight
Lion Knight
 
Posts: 4449
Joined: Jul 15, 2009 00:00
Location: Hamburg

Postby holsten-knight » May 24, 2010 22:59

our skald plays without keyboard... he clicks everything! :lol:

User avatar
Red1
Warder
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Apr 01, 2010 00:00

Postby Red1 » May 24, 2010 23:00

Zarkor wrote:
Red1 wrote:Old RA's...This will destroy Mercs/Zerks/BM's. Guess is it time for me to put my Merc up for sale 8O


ROFL. Because they lose Charge? 8O

Learn 2 play your Merc if you think he's useless without NF Charge tbfh.


Are you serious? What is the 1 single reason people make a Merc/Zerk/BM over say an Arms/Warrior/Hero? Without Charge, they are just a less HP version of the main tanks. But I am guessing you play one of the main tanks right? Or an already OP Minstrel?

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » May 24, 2010 23:06

Red1 wrote:Are you serious? What is the 1 single reason people make a Merc/Zerk/BM over say an Arms/Warrior/Hero? Without Charge, they are just a less HP version of the main tanks. But I am guessing you play one of the main tanks right? Or an already OP Minstrel?


You clearly don't play end RvR on Uthgard, or at least aren't experienced with it.

Maintanks for DPS rofl, that's like Friars for a Cleric spot on Uthgard. I play BM/Eld/Bard mainly atm...



And minstrels being OP? That's just.. wow... HAH. :grin:

User avatar
afa
Warder
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Feb 18, 2009 01:00

Postby afa » May 24, 2010 23:26

ppl aready whining cause they must change their playstyle?
no more easy farming on a server with broken realm abilitys?
no charge/purge3/sos/viper/pd for my char anymore QQ

to all the whiners

adapt or die(ingame ofc) in agony

User avatar
Neju
Eagle Knight
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Sep 11, 2009 00:00

Postby Neju » May 24, 2010 23:28

the people who are saying that this is good dont play :D


and all the active rvr players are saying this might be bad...

uthgard in a nutshell :grin:
I two-shot Zerkers

User avatar
Ciubhran
Banned
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Jul 26, 2008 00:00
Location: Sweden

Postby Ciubhran » May 24, 2010 23:33

Regardless of if this is bad or not...

This should be a Classic server and it should have Classic RAs implemented.

My best memories of DAoC was with the Classic RAs, and regardless of RA system, there is always some stuff that's going to be crap and some stuff that's going to be overpowered.

Adjust and get over it.

User avatar
Gil
Alerion Knight
 
Posts: 2061
Joined: Jan 06, 2010 01:00
Location: Denmark

Postby Gil » May 24, 2010 23:34

Neju wrote:the people who are saying that this is good dont play :D


and all the active rvr players are saying this might be bad...

uthgard in a nutshell :grin:

No, all the active RvR players are NOT saying this might be bad...
Most active RvR players don't post here. It's the FORUM warriors that are QQing.

Zarkor
Unicorn Knight
 
Posts: 3710
Joined: Aug 15, 2006 00:00
Location: Antwerp, Flanders, Belgium

Postby Zarkor » May 24, 2010 23:53

Ciubhran wrote:Regardless of if this is bad or not...

This should be a Classic server and it should have Classic RAs implemented.

My best memories of DAoC was with the Classic RAs, and regardless of RA system, there is always some stuff that's going to be crap and some stuff that's going to be overpowered.

Adjust and get over it.


Well said.

Toblerone
Banned
 
Posts: 1071
Joined: Jan 27, 2010 01:00
Location: Croatia

Postby Toblerone » May 25, 2010 00:01

Gil wrote:
Neju wrote:the people who are saying that this is good dont play :D


and all the active rvr players are saying this might be bad...

uthgard in a nutshell :grin:

No, all the active RvR players are NOT saying this might be bad...
Most active RvR players don't post here. It's the FORUM warriors that are QQing.


Most don't post, but the ones who do are saying it's bad. Including me.
[23:53] <@ref^> i once hugged a girl you know

[20:03] <@ref^^> I AM NOT STUPID
[20:03] <@ref^^> but i am retardd

User avatar
Force
Phoenix Knight
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Oct 22, 2009 00:00

Postby Force » May 25, 2010 00:22

Most my time here is spent in rvr and I'm looking forward to this, so speak for yourself.

PreviousNext

Return to News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

Saturday, 19. April 2025

Artwork and screen shots Copyright © 2001-2004 Mythic Entertainment, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission of Mythic Entertainment. Mythic Entertainment, the Mythic Entertainment logo, "Dark Age of Camelot," "Shrouded Isles," "Foundations," "New Frontiers," "Trials of Atlantis," "Catacombs," "Darkness Rising," the Dark Age of Camelot and subsequent logos, and the stylized Celtic knot are trademarks of Mythic Entertainment, Inc.

Valid XHTML & CSS | Original Design by: LernVid.com | Modified by Uthgard Staff