BM damage
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
Why is it lower than our counterparts (Merc and Zerker)?
|
|
For me, playing a 5L BM sometimes i think that BM dmg is rly decent
![]() |
|
my damage is allright tbh. dunno why people cry about that
large weapon damage is ****** tbh. i do 200-250 mainhand hits, while 2handers hit for 250-300. ![]() |
|
Some solo arms (slash damage) hits my ranger (pd4) for 180 to 270^^ |
|
That is some ****** DPS. The Armsman's attack speed is almost certainly over 4 seconds. Since he used his pole-arm I'm going to assume this was after a slam and he was behind you? That means the Armsman could stand there and pound on you with a high-growth positional and it would still take him 5-8 swings (20-32 seconds) to kill you. PD 4 or not, that's really sad.
|
|
Hum, and now tell me whats bad about that damage for rr5 Armsman vs 50% resistance. I thought about it and I dont get your point. Edit: He can strike 3 times while stunned. |
|
Dinj, what RA's do you have currently?
|
|
det5,charge2,str3,mopain3,longwind2,dex2 ![]() |
|
Firbolg blunt BMs dont need dex 2 :p ![]() ![]() |
|
he's getting ready for old RA's pre reqs
![]() |
|
xD we all get a forced respec |
|
EHEHEHEHE XDDDDDDDDD
|
|
Because you don't use your (side style) follow ups frequently enough. |
|
it's lower because BM growth rates are crap
the only good dmg is the side chain, thats all...backsnare is crap GR as well. If you want to do decent dmg, get a firbolg bm...spec 50 CD 40 slash 40 pierce, and get a dmg add charge. use your dmg add charge every minute in a fight, it does as much dmg as craaappy Triple Wield. If you do this you will do as much as most mercs and you will never have a target resistant to your dmg type. You still won't do as much dmg as zerkers, but it will be alright compared to alb tanks (not reaver tho). <Vanquish>
Panche - 7LX Druid Soxxs - 7LX BM |
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests